Talk:Andre Stojka

Even though the age statistics have an interesting and humorous nature, they seem make fun of this actor, by pointing out his young age. I think that this info is really not needed here. (It's fine for the ToO because they exist for observances). But, does anyone else have any thoughts about this? Erwin Springer [talk] 21:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

I really don't see how it makes fun of the actor. Besides, who want's to navigate a wiki that has strictly bare bones details and a serious nature on every single page? Not I. Those are interesting facts that people would enjoy. If someone wanted to believe that it makes fun of him, I could see how they would believe that. But IU don't think that the average person is going to see that info and think, "Oh that makes fun of him." And if we're worried about offending Mr. Srojka, I don't think he'll ever visit this wiki. And there is nothing wrong with the actor being young. Being young is a good thing. MarvelousMarvin 00:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Just because he doesn't visit the wiki doesn't mean we can make fun of him. Though I am not sure that we're making fun of him. It's that it doesn't matter if he never visits. Stop Wooton Around 22:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

True Wooton, and thank you for making that point. But the point of the info is that Mr. Whittaker is supposed to be an old man, and he has always sounded like an old man. And the guy who currently plays him is sound even older than the guys who played Mr. Whittaker before. The information merely points out that someone who plays a very old character really isn't old at all! It isn't making fun of him. MarvelousMarvin 01:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Gallery

These should be CATGALLERY and pull automatically so the page doesn't have to be edited when new pictures are uploaded... OdysseyFan (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2020 (MDT)